A place for us to talk about Nikon related camera gear.
Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.
by stubbsy on Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:32 pm
Yesterday when I started shooting with my trusty 28-70 f2.8 Nikkor all my images were overexposed by around 3 stops. After some investigation it turned out that the small silver lever that opens and closes the aperture blades is extremely stiff and doesn't get snapped into place with the sping like it should. You can slide it to a spot and the blades stay there. Hard to say if it's just a broken spring (which I doubt since it's quite stiff when I move it), but regardless it's off to the doctors for repair. What really annoys me is this is a pro grade lens (with a price to match) and after 2 or so years not only is the rubber grip almost completely unglued, but now this. Doesn't make me confident of Nikon's build quality. Given I'm buying a new body for my Antarctic trip maybe it's time to consider a switch to Canon 
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by dviv on Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:44 pm
Sorry to hear about the lens Peter, hopefully Nikon service come through. stubbsy wrote:Given I'm buying a new body for my Antarctic trip maybe it's time to consider a switch to Canon  You know you want to 
7D, 60D, 70-200mm f/4LIS, 17-50mm f/2.8, 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 50mm f/1.4, 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 580EX II
-

dviv
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:50 am
- Location: North Shore, Sydney
by chrisk on Sun Mar 21, 2010 9:52 pm
a long time ago i told an old boss i was leaving for another job. he asked me a simple question. "are you running away from something or are you running towards something."
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-

chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
by Greg B on Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:05 pm
Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
-

Greg B
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 5938
- Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
- Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne
-
by aim54x on Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:09 am
Peter, fingers crossed that they Dr is nice!
I do hope you stay with Nikon though.
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by chrisk on Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:01 am
lol lucky i'm no sprinter heh ?
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-

chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
by Alpha_7 on Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:09 am
De ja vu - Stubbsy shame about your lens, and your right we pay a lot of money for Pro glass, and yet we generally treat it better then Pros, if it was with a reporter or sports shooter it would of had a much harder life so far - yet its crapping out on you. Peter if you do go to the dark side, I'm keen to take the 70-200 and TC off your hands so I have something longer for Antartica. Only 9 days to go
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by myarhidia on Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:45 am
stubbsy wrote:Yesterday when I started shooting with my trusty 28-70 f2.8 Nikkor all my images were overexposed by around 3 stops. After some investigation it turned out that the small silver lever that opens and closes the aperture blades is extremely stiff and doesn't get snapped into place with the sping like it should. You can slide it to a spot and the blades stay there. Hard to say if it's just a broken spring (which I doubt since it's quite stiff when I move it), but regardless it's off to the doctors for repair.
What really annoys me is this is a pro grade lens (with a price to match) and after 2 or so years not only is the rubber grip almost completely unglued, but now this. Doesn't make me confident of Nikon's build quality.
Talk about Déjà vu, your lens must have come out of the same batch that mine did...... - return spring on the aperture, did that about 2 years ago - rubber grip - same problem - pre-warning you on #3 issue..... viewtopic.php?f=38&t=38566
Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
-

myarhidia
- Member
-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:49 pm
- Location: Kingsgrove, Sydney, So where the bloody hell are you?
by aim54x on Mon Mar 22, 2010 10:32 am
OUCH! I remember that thread....
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by Killakoala on Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:49 pm
I dare not take mine out now 
Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
-

Killakoala
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: Southland NZ
-
by Lucifer on Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:39 pm
My Dad has one of these since 2001. No problem with it so far. He is a weekend shooter.
I also got one for myself. Love the lens. Have no problems with it at all.
-
Lucifer
- Newbie
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 2:42 pm
by glamy on Fri Mar 26, 2010 5:09 pm
This is the lens I use most after the 17-35 and it has never missed a bit... The newer lenses are not without issues either.
-

glamy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1112
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:38 pm
- Location: S/W Sydney- D70+D2X
by stubbsy on Sun Mar 28, 2010 9:58 am
Well I have my repair quote from Nikon which also includes replacing the big 1.5 cm wide rubber ring around the outside of the body that is mostly unglued (go Nikon build quality - glue that lasts less than a few years of basic use!):
$27.92 REAR GROUP PROTECTOR RING - $27.12 APERTURE COUPLING LEVER $13.24 RUBBER RING $270.00 SERVICE LABOUR $8.25 CONSUMABLES
That gives a grand total of $346.53 plus another $9.90 to have it freighted back to me.
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by aim54x on Sun Mar 28, 2010 10:12 am
stubbsy wrote:Well I have my repair quote from Nikon which also includes replacing the big 1.5 cm wide rubber ring around the outside of the body that is mostly unglued (go Nikon build quality - glue that lasts less than a few years of basic use!):
$27.92 REAR GROUP PROTECTOR RING - $27.12 APERTURE COUPLING LEVER $13.24 RUBBER RING $270.00 SERVICE LABOUR $8.25 CONSUMABLES
That gives a grand total of $346.53 plus another $9.90 to have it freighted back to me.
Gotta love how expensive the labour is going to be.....Gerry had a very nice theory about this labour charge...being the highest they think someone will be willing to pay for the job. Glad to hear that this is not a very expensive repair after all.
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by gstark on Sun Mar 28, 2010 11:09 am
Actually, that sounds like it's about three hours labour. Given the intricacy of the work and in particular, what probably needs to be done with re-assembly and calibration, that's probably not too bad.
Of course the frustrating part of this is realising that the failure of a $30 part on a $2500 lens has caused a $350 repair bill!
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by biggerry on Sun Mar 28, 2010 4:31 pm
$27.92 REAR GROUP PROTECTOR RING - $27.12 APERTURE COUPLING LEVER
Peter, great to hear it is a relatviely inexpensive repair, i would be interested in the details of waht actually failed, it sounds obviously mechanical and given your description of the aperture lever being sticky the spring or some part has departed and partially jammed it. Gerry had a very nice theory about this labour charge
yeah, really it just makes good business practice from their end. really, 270 for labour it probably ok when your dealing with a lens worth thousands, that kinda money would, in my opinion, ensure there is more than just a monkey with a screwdriver.
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by chrisk on Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:42 pm
one one hand annoying that a pro lens needs this sort of repair in the first place. that i understand. but the cost to me looks more that reasonable. $270 in labour is bugger all in todays terms. i got charged something like that recently to fix my busted fridge, (4 yrs old), and the bloke was only in the house for an hour...$120 labour and $130 call out fee.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-

chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
by biggerry on Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:57 pm
i got charged something like that recently to fix my busted fridge, (4 yrs old), and the bloke was only in the house for an hour...$120 labour and $130 call out fee
i hear ya, how about plumbers - man their pay is ridiculous imo, i would not be saying that if I was a plumber tho
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by Matt. K on Sun Mar 28, 2010 9:14 pm
Peter Having had quite a bit of Nikon stuff repaired at NIKON your quote is on the lower side of expensive. At least the lens will have a guarantee/warranty period and in my experience will be as good as new when you get it back.
Regards
Matt. K
-

Matt. K
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
-
- Posts: 9981
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: North Nowra
Return to Nikon
|