Canon 16-35mm F2.8L Mk I or Mk II?Moderators: gstark, Moderators 
		
			Forum rules 
	Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this. 
            Previous topic • Next topic 
			5 posts
			 • Page 1 of 1
		 
	
Canon 16-35mm F2.8L Mk I or Mk II?Really, what is the difference? Are we mere mortals going to be able to tell? 
                  
            
		
 Re: Canon 16-35mm F2.8L Mk I or Mk II?I own the MkII and absolutely love it! awesome lens! 
                  
            
		from my understanding the MkII has removed CA issues and Better Performance on FF on wide end around the edges... 
 Re: Canon 16-35mm F2.8L Mk I or Mk II?There appears to be a difference (apart from the 82mm filter thread  
                  
            If you want to have a peep, this is good! http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Revi ... nsComp=412 ---
 
		Equipment: camera body, wide lens, standard lens, telephoto lens, flash Wish list: skill 
 Re: Canon 16-35mm F2.8L Mk I or Mk II?Looks to have a bit better resolving power. I've owned both and currently own the mkII. Can't tell the difference in real world use. 
                  
            Canon 1D III 
		
 Re: Canon 16-35mm F2.8L Mk I or Mk II?Thanks for the heads up Adam, but even with that review I don't think it will make that much of a difference day to day. Save a bit o cash buying the Mk I tho! 
                  
            
		
 
            Previous topic • Next topic  
			5 posts
			 • Page 1 of 1
		 
	
 |