DSLRUsers.com

A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.

Skip to content

New Modeling Images

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Write comments

New Modeling Images

Postby Cre8tivepixels on Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:03 pm

Thanks for looking.........a few of my latest (some older shots from older shoots but new images)

Image

Image

Image

Image

Cheers
dan
User avatar
Cre8tivepixels
Senior Member
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Malabar - Sydney
Top

Postby wendellt on Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:09 pm

the pose in the 2nd one is good and its a little bit more mysterious with the added ambience of the depth of field and the model not looking at the cam

like the one of anqui too, this one is good
Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents
Press - Getty Images
Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency
My Book - Zeduce
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
Top

Postby SteveB on Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:21 pm

Beautiful lighting on the 2nd image Dan and I like the hair accross the face on the 1st.
User avatar
SteveB
Member
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 8:57 pm
Location: Caboolture, QLD
Top

Postby Bindii on Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:23 pm

They are all great... but that second on is superb! :)
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list... ;)
User avatar
Bindii
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: Ormeau Hills Queensland
Top

Postby Oz_Beachside on Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:56 pm

second is my fav too, the fold lines in the sheet bother me though (sad that I notice these things...) :D
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200
Top

Postby Cre8tivepixels on Sun Jul 29, 2007 11:42 pm

isnt it funny, number two for mine was the weakest of the lot.....shows you how much i know....lol
User avatar
Cre8tivepixels
Senior Member
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Malabar - Sydney
Top

Postby Alex on Sun Jul 29, 2007 11:47 pm

I like the pose and eye contact in No. 2 also. Like how the shadow on the RHS of her face is, yet the eye is still well exposed and focused.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon
Top

Postby who on Mon Jul 30, 2007 12:00 am

#2 is by far my favorite.

#1 I dislike for subjective reasons (the glasses and the brightness of the halter/upper body).

#3 is a very unusual take on colours and I do like it, but not as good as #2

#4 is an innovative idea, but I find a 1/2 face very strange...... again a subjective opinion..... no technical backing.
who
Senior Member
 
Posts: 543
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:38 pm
Location: Ulverstone, TAS
Top

Postby barry on Mon Jul 30, 2007 1:18 pm

Dan I like #3 the best, it is someting different. #1 looks like the bottom half is overexposed a bit. Maybe some burning would help?
D700, 50 1.8, 14-24 2.8, 24-70 2.8, 70-200VR, 80-400VR, SB800 plus a lot of gadgets
User avatar
barry
Member
 
Posts: 475
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 9:25 am
Location: Emu Plains NSW
Top

Postby shakey on Mon Jul 30, 2007 8:21 pm

Number three. Striking, unusual. Wonderful colours around the eye...background colours echoing the colour tonal range.
User avatar
shakey
Senior Member
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:24 pm
Location: Far South Coast NSW
Top
Write comments

Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Copyright © 2005 - 2022 Gary Stark


Portal XL 5.0 ~ Plain 0.2