Your comments are welcome.
Click for full size image
DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
Fireflies???Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Fireflies???
The following was taken at the same time as my Challenge 6 entry “Rush Hour” and is actually the same subject; i.e. Brisbane’s south east freeway. The ten-second exposure was done while walking along the overpass from which I had taken the original entry shot. It certainly made for an abstract result.
Your comments are welcome. Click for full size image Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
This has a really interest appeal for me. I like, although i'm not entirely sure why. Must be the patterns.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
I'm with Steve on this Simon. AN interesting and clever abstract that grabs and holds my interest. Well done.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Good one Simon...
Personally I would have voted that one higher than your actual entry... I find it much more interesting and creative than the static shot... Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
a very good abstract.........I like it, well done........
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
That is a very good abstract, just shows what can be done with a little imagination.
 "The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"
D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
I agree...you should have entered that one....I love it
"If your pictures aren't good enough, you're probably not close enough." Robert Capa.
D70 - Nikon 18-70 (Kit Lens), 50mm f1.4, 70-300G, SB-800, Manfrotto 190D tripod, 141RC head, and 676B monopod.
Thank you, gents, for your kind words. This sort of stuff certainly polarises viewers into the love it or hate it camp and I guess the haters have decided not to be nasty and just moved on without comment.
Steve: I'm pleased you like it Peter: Thanks for the positive comments Leek: Thanks, John. I actually thought pretty hard about entering this one but decided not to on the basis that its appeal lay in what it was and how it was acheived. My personal opinion on the Challenges is that images should be seen to fit the theme without the photographer having to explain much to the viewer and, in this respect, this image failed my own test. Don't get me wrong, I really appreciated the description you added to your entry but, for me, your image's relationship to the theme was already obvious and your words just added interest without explaining what the viewer was supposed to see. I'm not sure 'Fireflies' would have stood out without a detailed explanation. Big Bix: Thanks Bernie - thought the abstract would appeal to you! Oneputt: Thank you John for your comments. Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
- Mods Database • The team • Delete all board cookies • Reset blocks • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
