10 second seconds

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

10 second seconds

Postby stubbsy on Wed Sep 21, 2005 10:00 pm

Below are two of three alternative pics I had for the latest comp. Now I'm looking at them I'm not sure my final choice was the right pic :cry: C'est la vie!

I won't show the third alternate since it's similar to someone else's entry and I'll keep it till after the comp.

Image

Image
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Glen on Wed Sep 21, 2005 10:25 pm

Stubbsy, love the first. It has a great degree of mystery surrounding it. Bridge shots are good, but with my predisposition towards them, I sort of mentally ruled them out (not that others should).
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby skyva on Thu Sep 22, 2005 1:47 am

I like both, but I was recently in the same spot you were when you took the second shot. I had the kit lens and no tripod, and it seems, no inspiration, as your shot is what I wished for, but didn't get. What lens and settings did you use for this, if you don't mind me asking? I took some ok shots but they were mainly of good scenery rather than good composition and effect.
skyva
Member
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 10:48 am
Location: Cranbourne; Melbourne

Postby chris1968 on Thu Sep 22, 2005 5:11 am

Love the first one Stubbsy - you just cant beat the look of 'cotton wool' the long exposure gives the water on shots like this!
in the beginning was the word, and the word was Aardvark......
User avatar
chris1968
Member
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 2:04 am
Location: Dark Side of the Moors. West Yorks. England.....D70

Postby stubbsy on Thu Sep 22, 2005 10:53 am

Guys, thanks for the comments

Glen
One of the reasons I ruled out the bridge shot is that it was my view that it would have to be spectacular to go in.

Skyva
Lens was Nikkor 12-24 at 12mm, F36 or F40 (not at my home computer and can't remember which)

Chris
I like this effect too, but had never tried it since I had no tripod. This one was the first outing with my Gitzo 1325 and I was quite pleased with the results.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby HappyFotographer on Thu Sep 22, 2005 10:58 am

Stubbsy the first one is really nice. As I still can't find the top thingymajig for my piece of crap masquerading as a tripod I have yet to take an image like this.....it's on my list of shots to do.

The bridge one, well after recently watching War of the Worlds this has a similar dark feel to me......like a storm about to break loose.

But hey, I haven't had my morning coffee yet, so take all of the above with a grain of salt.

Deb
"Sometimes when you are sad Poko, it's good to hug the monkey."
User avatar
HappyFotographer
Member
 
Posts: 392
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 4:58 pm
Location: Mnt Riverview Blue Mountains - Nikon D70

Postby Glen on Thu Sep 22, 2005 11:02 am

The thing I find with taking shots drom Dawes Point of the bridge is that Luna Park usually exposes the lack of dynamic range of the camera. I love the exposure of everything else in your image but LP is overblown. I find the same problem when I shoot from there. Taking two shots and combining would be the answer, but A)that would not be eligible for this comp and B) I am useless with Photoshop.
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Oneputt on Thu Sep 22, 2005 11:06 am

I have to agree with the others. I really like the atmosphere created in the first shot :D
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby Potatis on Thu Sep 22, 2005 12:05 pm

I really like the first shot. The bridge has a bit of a lean to the left, but I love those clouds!
Doug C.
Potatis
Senior Member
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:04 am
Location: Mosman

Postby Aussie Dave on Thu Sep 22, 2005 10:16 pm

Thought I'd post one of my rejects from Challenge 6. I thought the subject may have perhaps given away the anonymity of the photographer (me), so chose to omit it. I was amazed that she stayed still for so long.
10 seconds when dealing with babies is an awfully long time.....I'm sure there are others out there that can vouch for that :lol:

Image PS...no drugs were used to keep her still for long enough :wink:
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby ozczecho on Thu Sep 22, 2005 10:21 pm

AussieDave..thats sensational. I would have never thought of doing that. Thats whats the best part about the comp/forum...always new ideas and inspiration.
User avatar
ozczecho
Senior Member
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
Location: Beecroft, Sydney

Postby stubbsy on Fri Sep 23, 2005 10:51 am

Dave

That's a damn clever shot and I doubt that, had you submitted it, this would have immediately identified it as being a pic of one of your twins.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Aussie Dave on Fri Sep 23, 2005 11:19 am

Quite possibly Stubbsy. However, I know if I had posted it, people may have talked/thought about who had young babies (who post photos of them every other week) and the field may have been narrowed down to one - me.

I still like the shot though, but possibly for biased reasons :wink:

It is very good to see how the creative minds work when given a set topic. These Challenges are so much fun to participate in....
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby Glen on Fri Sep 23, 2005 11:32 am

Dave, very imaginative, there are a few babies on the forum so you probably wouldn't be picked.
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby sirhc55 on Fri Sep 23, 2005 11:46 am

stubbsy wrote:
Skyva
Lens was Nikkor 12-24 at 12mm, F36 or F40 (not at my home computer and can't remember which)



Peter - I am fascinated as to how you got f/36 or f/40 out of a lens that has a range of f/4 to f/22 - were you using an ND filter :?:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Oneputt on Fri Sep 23, 2005 1:32 pm

AussieDave - that is a great shot and something that I would never have thought of :D
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby stubbsy on Fri Sep 23, 2005 1:33 pm

sirhc55 wrote:
stubbsy wrote:
Skyva
Lens was Nikkor 12-24 at 12mm, F36 or F40 (not at my home computer and can't remember which)



Peter - I am fascinated as to how you got f/36 or f/40 out of a lens that has a range of f/4 to f/22 - were you using an ND filter :?:

Chris

It was my memory I was relying on so I'm no doubt wrong :wink: . No ND filter, but did have the CPL on because I forgot to remove it! I'll recheck at home tonight
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Aussie Dave on Fri Sep 23, 2005 1:40 pm

cheers guys :D

I must admit, I didn't think it would turn out anywhere near as well as it did. I thought for sure she would move or stir and that would be it. And to think I only had to make 2 attempts.

Who needs VR, hey ?? :lol:

Go the power of the Sigma ! :twisted:
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby stubbsy on Sat Sep 24, 2005 12:18 am

Just rechecked the EXIF on my first pic. All I got right was the F40 :oops: . It was actually the 70-200 VR at 120mm (not 12-24 at 12!).

Last time I rely on memory.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby flipfrog on Sat Sep 24, 2005 4:34 am

the misty rocks pic is amazing!
i'd like to see it in black and white
User avatar
flipfrog
Senior Member
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Vancouver Canada

Postby dooda on Sat Sep 24, 2005 11:41 am

I think that the misty rock pic needs a horizon or something to make it the absolute shiznitt. It's still pretty nice though.
love's first sighs are wisdom's last

Dave
http://www.flickr.com/photos/elton/
User avatar
dooda
Party Animal
 
Posts: 1591
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada

Postby KerryPierce on Sun Sep 25, 2005 1:57 am

The bridge shot is the cat's meow, Peter. I really like that shot. :)
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby stubbsy on Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:46 am

Thanks for the feedback gentlemen.

Kerry - "Cat's meow" - I thought you were a dog person. Does this mean you don't like it (just kidding) :wink: :wink:
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Manta on Sun Sep 25, 2005 11:02 am

dooda wrote:I think that the misty rock pic needs a horizon or something to make it the absolute shiznitt. It's still pretty nice though.


Dooda's posts are doing wondrous things for my vocabulary! Shiznitt??

I think both shots are pretty shiznitt as they are though I agree with Dooda's comment about some point of reference in the water shot. The sky in the bridge image is awesome but I was a little distracted by the browned-out area in the top left. Was that the natural colouring or some kind of chromatic/vignette effect of the lens?

Aussie Dave - superb capture and one that will be treasured in years to come. Well done!
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby stubbsy on Sun Sep 25, 2005 3:01 pm

Manta wrote:
dooda wrote:I think that the misty rock pic needs a horizon or something to make it the absolute shiznitt. It's still pretty nice though.


Dooda's posts are doing wondrous things for my vocabulary! Shiznitt??

I think both shots are pretty shiznitt as they are though I agree with Dooda's comment about some point of reference in the water shot. The sky in the bridge image is awesome but I was a little distracted by the browned-out area in the top left. Was that the natural colouring or some kind of chromatic/vignette effect of the lens?

Aussie Dave - superb capture and one that will be treasured in years to come. Well done!

Thanks Simon. The brown in the corner was a drop of water on the lens :evil: which I tried my best to remove in PP (it was drizzling when I took the pic)
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Manta on Sun Sep 25, 2005 5:51 pm

Don't you HATE that. PS can work wonders but it's really annoying when you have to fiddle around so much to fix a small area of the image.

Now if you were in Brisbane where we NEVER GET ANY BLOODY RAIN :evil: , you'd have nothing to worry about, would you?
(Except for the fact that the bowels of the Story Bridge are nowhere near as picturesque as the nether regions of the Coathanger...)
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques