10-Seconds - Tunnel Vision - Behind the Scenes

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

10-Seconds - Tunnel Vision - Behind the Scenes

Postby leek on Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:28 am

When thinking about the theme of the last competition, I thought that many people would opt for a nightscape, light trails, strobe images or light paintings so, being me, I decided to try for something that was a little more out of the ordinary...

My first thought was that instead of letting the subject move, what would it look like if I let the camera move against static objects????

My first attempt was during daylight hours and was predictably overexposed:

Image

This wasn't terribly good, so I quickly came to the conclusion that I would need a situation involving less ambient light...

At the time, I was driving back and forth to my work location, driving through several tunnels, so I thought that these locations might fit the bill... My original concept was to try to capture the hypnotic effect of driving through a tunnel, capturing the tunnel lights and walls whooshing by the camera...
Image Image

While doing this, it occurred to me that it might be fun to match the speed of a nearby car - thereby rendering an image that might be recognisable as a car against the moving lights and walls of the tunnel...

Image Image

Not bad - I thought... but I'm sure I can do better...

After a few attempts, I managed to capture an image where you could almost pick the type of car... As I said in the description attached to the photo, this involved closely matching the speed of the other car over 200m at 80 km/h...

Image

I played around with the saturation levels and arrived at my competition entry...
Image

I must admit that I laughed when Trent (MCWB) published some pics from Belgium the next day and patented the term inverse panning, coz that was exactly what I had been trying for... In fact I made a comment that it was a shame that he hadn't done it for 10 seconds to enter the competition :lol:

I was a little disappointed with my overall ranking in the competition (20 out of 28 :-( )
However, I enjoyed creating something original and personally thought that the eventual image had a sort of impressionist feel to it...

My image obviously polarised opinions in the voting and the "Excellents" and "Very Goods" were more than cancelled out by the "Not my cup of tea" and "Well it's a Picture" votes...

So, in short, after the last two comps... I've learnt my lesson for the next one...

Keep it simple... Don't experiment... :lol: :lol:
Last edited by leek on Mon Sep 26, 2005 8:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby PiroStitch on Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:38 am

Leek I know exactly how you feel as that was my train of thought as well :) With long term exposures I knew it was pretty much down to the normal landscapes, waterscapes, ghosts, light-trails, etc with a tripod.

I opted to go tripod free for mine ;) Obviously my pic didn't do it for the masses either :D Ah well.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques