Page 1 of 1
Fun at Lighthouse Park

Posted:
Sun Feb 12, 2006 12:55 pm
by dooda
I went to my absolutely favorite place ever last night, caught a couple of pictures, had some fun, relaxed, and even met some other cook who likes to walk through the woods (about 1 kilometer) in the middle of the night to enjoy the moonlight. I find this place really rejuvenating.
Critique and comments are welcome. I'm sort of torn, I really want to go back tonight, but there's another area that's calling my name as well.
THe lighthouse pic was about 3 1/2 minute shutter, the other one was 5 minutes. Both taken with the Sigma 10-20 mm.

Posted:
Sun Feb 12, 2006 1:10 pm
by leek
Nice images Dave...
It's probably distortion caused by the WA lens, but my eye keeps getting attracted to the lighthouse that doesn't appear to be quite vertical.

Posted:
Sun Feb 12, 2006 1:28 pm
by dooda
Oops, i should have corrected that. I keep forgetting to since getting this WA. I'll correct it in a little bit. Thanks!

Posted:
Sun Feb 12, 2006 1:31 pm
by Slider
Fantastic shots. The 2nd is a beauty


Posted:
Mon Feb 13, 2006 4:31 pm
by Willigan
Great shots Dooda. It's a pity about the red streak on the right in the second one - it's a little distracting

Posted:
Mon Feb 13, 2006 4:33 pm
by Alpha_7
Lovely stuff Dooda! As usual your night time shots are inspiring and relaxing to view!

Posted:
Mon Feb 13, 2006 4:37 pm
by NikonUser
Very nice.
I love the first one. The detail in the rock in the foreground and also on the rocks that the lighthouse is sat in is great.
Colours are really nice too.
Must be quite a solid setup you have to get them that sharp at 3.5 mins!!
Paul

Posted:
Mon Feb 13, 2006 6:41 pm
by dooda
Willigan, I could have cloned the red streak, but I like it too much. It's at a dynamic angle, and the sweep of the stars sort of leads me to that direction. Also, it's not that strong, so for me it doesn't pull me away, (unlike direct light which is my nemesis).
I'd be interested in hearing what anyone else thinks about the red reflection.

Posted:
Mon Feb 13, 2006 6:45 pm
by NikonUser
My choice would be to clone out the red reflection.

Posted:
Mon Feb 13, 2006 7:05 pm
by dooda
Heh, my setup consists of a $95 slik. Really light weight so I can hike long distances and not worry about it. Easy to stow along. I recently added a Velbon ballhead so I could get my shots level.

Posted:
Mon Feb 13, 2006 8:07 pm
by ABG
Lovely images Dave - the first one being my favourite. I quite like the red reflection and wouldn't clone it out personally.

Posted:
Mon Feb 13, 2006 8:26 pm
by PiroStitch
Dooda,
Awesome pics! I'm constantly scratching my head over your pics as they just blow me away! The midnight landscapes all look very surreal and alien, like something straight out of a sci-fi movie. Great stuff!

Posted:
Tue Feb 14, 2006 12:18 am
by Bretski
Mate... that first one gets my vote... what a great shot...


Posted:
Tue Feb 14, 2006 12:31 pm
by Willigan
dooda wrote:Willigan, I could have cloned the red streak, but I like it too much.
Yep. Fair enough

It's just a preference thing - I just thought it was off-putting as it was at an intersecting angle to the star trails.

Posted:
Tue Feb 14, 2006 4:05 pm
by BT*ist
The first one is gorgeous. I had no idea you could get such an even amount of light in 3.5mins at night!?

Posted:
Tue Feb 14, 2006 4:38 pm
by huynhie
Great shots Dave.
I can't decide which one I like more, both are fantastic.

Posted:
Wed Feb 15, 2006 6:35 am
by dooda
BT*ist
This is why I shoot so often at night, especially by moonlight, is because the light is MORE even. With the sun glaring everywhere, a perfect exposure is never possible and you have to blend everything in layers. At night, the light is much more even, especially when the moon is out.

Posted:
Wed Feb 15, 2006 10:21 am
by flipfrog
dave
how do you decide on your exposure time (shutter) when u shoot in bulb? is it a matter of trial and error?
and out of curiosity , why f6.3 ?

Posted:
Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:36 am
by dooda
Dee,
I tend to do a couple of pictures at ISO 1600 with NR turned off. This gives me a base for exposure times, and all the rest of the shutter times will be around it. When I move it back down to ISO 200, I simply multiply the shutter speed by 8.
I can't remeber why 6.3. There was probably a good reason, but probably not a great one. It depends how long I think I can stand waiting, and how big an effect I think it will have on the picture.

Posted:
Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:19 pm
by flipfrog
so your test shots are made in program
mode at iso 1600, right?

Posted:
Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:49 pm
by Onyx
Dave, you should place yourself in these landscape images. Just sit yourself infront of the lens after you trip the shutter. For that "I was here" type shot.

They're gorgeous breathtaking scenes.

Posted:
Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:21 pm
by dooda
Their you go Onyx. I actually throw myself in there every so often for fun. I've thought about going back and having a small candle lit on the rocks, lighting up my face a little bit.
Dee, no I always shoot in manual. I'll set the apeture I want, then go ten seconds or so depending on how much light there is. Make sure I get it right at 1600 and then go down to 200, multiply shutter by 8, turn on NR